Native Title and Cultural Heritage Processes Review
448. Mr Lachlan Hunter to the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs:
I refer to the review of the native title and Aboriginal cultural heritage processes, which is due to conclude this month, with the final report to be provided to the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and the Premier. The terms of reference require consultation with key stakeholders, including the agricultural sector, yet the head reviewer has told the Pastoralists and Graziers Association of WA that personal interests are tangential to this review.
What consultation is actually taking place with agricultural and pastoral stakeholders and landholder groups, such as the PGA?
Mr Don Punch replied:
I thank the member for the question. Consultation is taking place in accordance with the terms of reference.
449. Mr Lachlan Hunter to the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs:
I have a supplementary question.
If major stakeholders like the PGA have been sidelined, how can the minister have any confidence that the final report will carry any legitimacy?
Mr Don Punch replied:
I think that is a pretty appalling indictment of the lead of the review, Mr Glen Kelly, who has a very strong reputation in this space.
Mr Lachlan Hunter interjected.
The Speaker: Member for Central Wheatbelt!
Mr Don Punch: In that context, he is undertaking the review in accordance with the terms of reference. The government will receive the report in due course.
Mr Lachlan Hunter interjected.
The Speaker: Hang on two secs, minister. Member for Central Wheatbelt, you have asked the question. Stop interjecting so the minister can respond.
Mr Don Punch: I have answered the question, Mr Speaker.
