Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 1346 asked in the Legislative Council on 17 November 2016 by Hon Lynn Maclaren

Parliament: 39 Session: 1

HISTORICAL HOMOSEXUAL OFFENCES — EXTINGUISHMENT OF CONVICTIONS

1346. Hon LYNN MacLAREN to the Attorney General:

I refer to public comments made by the Attorney General within the past week regarding the extinguishment of convictions for historical homosexual offences in Western Australia.

(1) Can the Attorney General please list the specific convictions that will be expunged under the government's proposal?

(2) How many of those convictions, in total, currently stand in Western Australia?

(3) Will the expungements also be applied to men charged with offences under the Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913, section 377A(2), between 7 December 1989 and 21 March 2002, when the age of consent was equalised?

(4) Will the expungement process include the destroying of fingerprint records and other evidence currently held against ''offenders''?

(5) Will the government also offer a formal apology to men charged with offences as part of the expungement process?

(6) When does the Attorney General expect that the cabinet submission will be reviewed by cabinet?

Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied:

I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question.

(1)–(5) A cabinet submission for a legislative scheme for the extinguishment of convictions for historical homosexual offences is currently under development.

(6) The cabinet submission will be considered by cabinet in the near future.

I should add that I am a little confused by the reference to section 377A(2). There is no section 377A(2). Section 377 was a curious provision relating to stealing the property of spouses. If it was a typo and section 277 was meant, that provision involves the definitions of ''homicide'' and categories of homicide. If it was section 177, it has to do with disobedience to statute law! I cannot help the member with that one.