Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets today (01:00 PM)Watch live
  • The Legislative Council meets today (01:00 PM)Watch live
  • The Estimates Committee meets tomorrow (09:30 AM)
    Committee meet tomorrow
  • The Joint Standing Committee on the Corruption and Crime Commission meets tomorrow (09:45 AM)
    Committee meet tomorrow

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 401 asked in the Legislative Council on 12 May 2020 by Hon Diane Evers

Parliament: 40 Session: 1

KARRI FOREST — TREENBROOK

401. Hon DIANE EVERS to the minister representing the Minister for Forestry:

I refer to the proposed logging of karri forest at Treenbrook state forest.

(1) How much karri forest at Treenbrook is proposed to be logged in the immediate term, and what amounts and grades of logs does the Forest Products Commission expect to obtain?

(2) What assessments have been done on the Treenbrook karri forest and will the minister please table them; and, if not, why not?

(3) Were the nearby residents and businesses consulted by the FPC on the proposed logging and the impacts to their business and livelihoods?

(a) If yes, when were they consulted and what issues were raised?

(b) If no, why not?

(4) Will the minister direct FPC to cancel operations and commit to reviewing the decision to log karri forest at Treenbrook state forest, given the significant impact on surrounding businesses?

(a) If no, why not?

Hon ALANNAH MacTIERNAN replied:

I thank the member for the question. The following information has been provided to me by the Minister for Forestry.

(1) In the immediate term, 50 hectares of karri forest associated with three harvest coupes in the Treenbrook forest are scheduled for harvest. This is expected to produce the following log grades to facilitate meeting customer orders: karri sawlog—9 000 tonnes; laminated veneer lumber—3 000 tonnes; and karri residue—4 000 tonnes.

(2) All necessary assessments and approvals have been undertaken and received for harvesting operations at each coupe in Treenbrook. Given the significant level of documentation associated with these assessments, it is not possible to table these assessments today. I commit to tabling this documentation at the earliest opportunity.

(3) Yes.

(a) Timber harvesting has been ongoing in the Treenbrook forest for a number of years and neighbours have been consulted in all instances. For the most recent proposed karri harvest coupe, Treenbrook 12, letters were sent in mid-January to neighbours and a number of direct contacts were made by FPC after that time up to the present. Issues raised have included windbreaks for avocado orchards, maintenance of views, access to private property and businesses run from those properties through forestry tracks in state forests, impacts on honey production and general noise from the harvesting operation.

(b) Not applicable.

(4) No.

(a) The regrowth forest areas in the Treenbrook state forest have been made available by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions as part of the three-year harvest plan under the ''Forest Management Plan 2014–23''. The area has been part of the state forest estate for over a century, and the forest in the area has been previously harvested and regenerated.