Skip to main content
Home
  • The Legislative Assembly meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Assembly sit 07/05/2024
  • The Legislative Council meets on 07/05/2024 (01:00 PM)
    Council sit 07/05/2024
  • The Public Administration meets on 29/04/2024 (11:00 AM)
    Committee meet 29/04/2024

Parliamentary Questions


Question Without Notice No. 493 asked in the Legislative Council on 7 May 2014 by Hon Lynn Maclaren

Parliament: 39 Session: 1

GROUNDWATER MONITORING — BASSENDEAN

493. Hon LYNN MacLAREN to the minister representing the Minister for Environment:

I refer to a letter in the Echo News of 5 April 2014 and the stockpile of toxic fertiliser waste in Bassendean.

(1) Why is this contaminated mound still there today?

(2) Is the government monitoring the groundwater contamination levels?

(3) What impact has it had on the Swan River?

(4) Why has the Department of Environment Regulation stated on its website that the nearest freshwater receptor is the Swan River, five kilometres to the south, when, in fact, the Ashfield Flats adjacent to the Swan River is 800 metres from the mound and the Swan River is 1 200 metres from the mound?

Hon HELEN MORTON replied:

I thank the member for some notice of the question.

(1) It is assumed that Hon Lynn MacLaren is referring to the former Tonkin Industrial Park. The mound the member refers to is located at lot 857. The site was subject to ministerial statement 82, dated October 1989, and in subsequent revisions of the ministerial statement, most recently ministerial statement 701, dated 25 November 2005. Approximately 250 000 square metres of contaminated pyritic cinders and demolition wastes are encapsulated in a purpose-built, permanent containment cell.

(2) The site owner of lot 857 has conducted monitoring of groundwater since January 2003 as a requirement of the ministerial statement.

(3) Based on the available information to date, the groundwater contamination does not extend to the Swan River, which is located 1.2 kilometres to the south coast.

(4) The Department of Environment Regulation advises that it cannot locate this reference on its website. The classification of the site under the Contaminated Sites Act 2003, which is publicly available from DER's website, does not indicate the distance to the Swan River.